The list of those opposed to a new government dairy supply control programme that House and Senate Ag Committee Chairs will attempt to sneak into the super committee bill is growing, according to the International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA).
Americans for Tax Reform, Citizens Against Government Waste and the National Taxpayers Union, have joined together to urge the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction to oppose a controversial dairy programme that will increase milk prices for consumers.
The groups are expressing their concerns in response to reports that congressional leadership, in a closed door session, has agreed to insert the highly controversial programme into the deficit reduction bill in order to avoid the regular legislative process that would allow hearings and amendments, the IDFA said.
The taxpayer organisations follow the Consumer Federation of America, which recently wrote to the Chairs of the House and Senate Agriculture Committees to voice their opposition to the same measure.
The IDFA said: “The Dairy Market Stabilisation Programme, included in HR 3062, is specifically designed to increase milk prices. This means that consumers would pay higher prices for milk and milk products than they otherwise would. As milk and dairy prices increase, low income consumers are hit especially hard, since they spend a higher percentage of their income on food than other consumers. In addition, research has shown that as milk prices increase, consumption of milk decreases. Federal nutrition guidelines encourage increased calcium consumption, and milk is a primary way that consumers obtain calcium in their diets.”
The IDFA claims that Collin Peterson’s Dairy Market Stabilisation Programme will increase milk prices by having the government control milk supply. According to economic analyses, the proposal would limit dairy industry growth, curtail dairy exports, and hinder job creation. Because the federal government is the largest consumer of dairy products, the increased costs due to the federal government nutrition programmes due to higher prices will greatly outweigh any possible savings from the programme.
Source: IDFA
© FoodBev Media Ltd 2024