“Our assessment shows that glass clearly has the most favourable carbon footprint,” says Jay Scripter, O-I vice president of sustainability. “When you look at the complete life cycle of glass, commonly held misconceptions are disproved. Food and beverage makers concerned about sustainability should choose glass.”
O-I’s life cycle assessment (LCA), which measures the carbon emissions generated by each phase in the life of a glass container, is foundational to the company’s ambitious new sustainability programme.
Addressing calls from customers, consumer product makers, retailers and environmental groups for greater clarity in LCA reporting, O-I’s study is the first in the packaging sector to follow the complete life of a package – from the extraction of raw materials to the reuse or recycling of the container. The model used for the study also allowed an assessment of cradle-to-cradle life cycle data on aluminium and plastic Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) containers, enabling the first true comparisons between the packaging materials.
“Widespread inconsistencies in carbon footprint assessments have made it nearly impossible to compare the impact of one packaging material with that of another,” says O-I CEO, Al Stroucken. “Many assessments used today only take into account a portion of the full life cycle of a product, resulting in incomplete and inaccurate data. Customers are sometimes unknowingly making packaging decisions based on incomplete data. We knew we needed to take the best and most complete approach possible to bring clarity to the conversation and provide an accurate picture of how glass compares with other packaging materials.”
O-I has used this study to establish aggressive sustainability goals, which the company intends to announce next week.
© FoodBev Media Ltd 2024