An advert for Coca-Cola-owned drinks brand innocent has been banned by the UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) watchdog for ‘greenwashing’ and providing ‘misleading’ environmental claims.
The advert featured an animated otter singing encouraging lyrics like “get fixing up the planet,” suggesting this could be achieved by purchasing innocent’s drinks.
A spokesperson for innocent told FoodBev: “We’re disappointed to see the ruling from the ASA. Our advert was always intended to highlight important global environmental issues and the need for collective action to make a change. We transparently share more about the work that we do on sustainability on our website.”
“As with any new guidelines, we’d like to work with the ASA and other brands to understand how to align to them to continue the conversation on these important topics.”
You might have spotted that our ad has been in the news today. Here’s a few thoughts from us on what’s been going down. pic.twitter.com/qY7THXsoRP — innocent drinks (@innocent) February 23, 2022
You might have spotted that our ad has been in the news today. Here’s a few thoughts from us on what’s been going down. pic.twitter.com/qY7THXsoRP
— innocent drinks (@innocent) February 23, 2022
ASA ruled that “there was no suggestion in the ad through statements or imagery that purchasing innocent products themselves would lead to a positive environmental impact”.
The ad was brought to ASA’s attention after 26 viewers, including a member of the environmental group Plastics Rebellion, claimed that the advert ‘misled’ customers by exaggerating the “total environmental benefits” of innocent’s products.
With ASA upholding the ruling, the watchdog also acknowledged that “some consumers would interpret the ad simply to mean that innocent had made an aspirational commitment to doing their part to do better for the environment, or that the ad was a call to action for everyone more generally to do better for the planet”.
However, ASA also commented: “Because we considered that the ads would be understood to mean that innocent was environmentally friendly and that purchasing their products had environmental benefits, we needed to see evidence that was the case. Although we acknowledged that innocent was undertaking various actions, which were aimed at reducing the environmental impact of their products, that did not demonstrate that their products had a net positive environmental impact over their full lifecycles.”
The ASA also noted that innocent’s drinks bottles included non-recycled plastic and that the extraction of raw materials and subsequent processing in order to produce the bottle would have a negative impact on the environment.
© FoodBev Media Ltd 2022
World Beverage Innovation Awards – NOW OPEN FOR ENTRIES!
The awards celebrate excellence and innovation across the global beverage industry. Don’t miss out on having your innovations recognised on a global scale.
Deadline for entries 23 July – enter now!
Don’t get left behind
Start your free Foodbev magazine trial today and join thousands of fellow industry professionals in receiving food and drink trends direct to our business.
Click here to start your free trial
Your privacy We use small files known as ‘cookies’ to enhance your experience of the FoodBev website and analyse site-traffic. Read about how we use cookies or how you may control them in our updated privacy policy and cookie policy. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies. Click the ‘OKAY‘ button at the top right of this panel to accept or click here for more information.