These actions are:
The Massachusetts Attorney General’s office on 8 July 2010 voided a decision made last spring at an annual town meeting in Concord that would have completely banned the sale of bottled water within the town limits. The AG’s decision declaring Concord’s vote to be null and void due to procedural errors may be a sign that the days of easy ‘wins’ could be over for anti-bottled water activists, who face increasing legal, economic and health policy scrutiny from government officials.
After the initial decision to ban the sale of bottled water, the Concord selectmen (board) voted to support the motivation of the ban, but also voted not to attempt to enforce the ban unless they heard otherwise from the AG’s office, which they did last week.
Concord’s legions of summer tourists will have no problem finding safe, healthy, convenient bottled water as they stroll through the historic town. Concord’s attempted sales ban came only a few days before nearby Boston, MA, endured a major boil alert leaving two million people without clean tap water over a three-day period. Bottled water companies worked around the clock to provide consumers with safe drinking water during the emergency.
The Commonwealth of Virginia’s newly elected governor, Bob McDonnell, took a second look at his predecessor’s ‘green’ initiatives on 11 July, which prohibited commonwealth agencies from purchasing single-serve bottled water for official functions and meetings, and by executive order deleted the anti-bottled water directive. According to the governor’s spokesperson, “This governor isn’t going to put in place mandates that hurt Virginia industries”.
IBWA data indicates that Virginia has a strong bottled water market, with a direct economic impact to the Commonwealth in 2009 of 3,719 jobs in bottling, wholesale and retail sales, and more than $145m in wages and salaries, and $865m in product sales.
Last year, Virginia earned nearly $95m in business taxes from bottled water companies and over $21m in consumer taxes on the purchase of bottled water. When the economic impact of related industries, such as trucking, store clerk salaries, label-producers and other induced economic spending, bottled water’s overall contribution to Virginia in 2009 was $2.6bn.
The San Francisco Examiner reported on 9 July 2010 that officials in Mayor Gavin Newsom’s office wanted to review a city official’s report that would prohibit the sale of bottled water at parades, fairs, festivals, ball games and any outdoor event on city property. Commenting at the time, the IBWA pointed out the potential unhealthiness of the proposal since people attending these outdoor events need to stay well-hydrated, particularly during the hot summer months.
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, city officials admitted that keeping people hydrated in bottled-water-free outdoor environments could be a challenge.
The San Francisco Chronicle also reported no further actions were taken on this proposal: “There was no public comment and the subcommittee couldn’t reach quorum and couldn’t take any action, even though there was no action to take. The report was never intended to be anything more than a brief, cursory answer to (the commissioner’s) question. For now, the discussion is over. The hot topic in City Hall is just another story that may never resurface.”
“These recent actions clearly demonstrate a shift in momentum for consumers,” says Tom Lauria, IBWA’s vice president of communications. “This July, we saw three major anti-bottled water initiatives fizzle out. Will they be back? Of course, but there’s a lot less wind at their back now that government leaders are giving way to common sense.”
Source: IBWA
© FoodBev Media Ltd 2024