Labels state those General Mills snacks are ‘fruit flavoured,’ ‘naturally flavoured,’ a ‘good source of vitamin C’ and low in calories, fat, and gluten, according to the complaint filed on behalf of a California mother by the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) and the consumer protection law firm Reese Richman LLP.
Obscured on labels is the fact that the so-called fruit snacks are mostly sugars (some from fruit concentrate and some from corn syrup), artificial additives, and potentially harmful artificial dyes, CSPI said.
The lawsuit has been filed because, even with the pear ingredient, the product provides little of the beneficial fibre or nutrients associated with real strawberries. While labels tout the naturalness of the added flavourings, CSPI says that many of the ingredients are artificial by anyone’s definition, including the partially hydrogenated cottonseed oil and the acetylated monoglycerides.
The side panels on some General Mills ‘fruit’ candies read ‘Made With Real Fruit.’ At least one variety of Fruit Roll-Ups has pictures of strawberries and oranges on the box. But despite the names of the products, there are no strawberries in Strawberry Fruit Roll-Ups, nor watermelon in Fruit Gushers Watermelon Blast. The bright colours of those products come from synthetic, petroleum-based dyes that can impair some children’s behaviour.
CSPI litigation director, Steve Gardner, said: “General Mills is basically dressing up a very cheap candy as if it were fruit and charging a premium for it. General Mills is giving consumers the false impression that these products are somehow more wholesome, and charging more. It’s an elaborate hoax on parents who are trying to do right by their kids.”
According to the complaint, filed in US District Court in the Northern District of California, the presence of partially hydrogenated oil in ‘fruit’ snacks marketed as healthy and wholesome is deceptive. The artificial trans fat in partially hydrogenated oil lowers HDL, or good cholesterol, raises LDL, or bad cholesterol. CSPI states that the amounts of trans fat are small, but that they have no place in a product marketed as if it were healthful and a source of fruit.
The complaint states: Defendant is conveying an overall message of a healthful snack product to parents when, in fact, the products contain dangerous, non-nutritious, unhealthy partially hydrogenated oil, large amounts of sugar, and potentially harmful artificial dyes.
The complaint contends that the labelling of fruit-flavoured snacks violates various state laws, including Minnesota’s Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and several California laws governing misleading and deceptive advertising and fraudulent business practices. General Mills is based in Golden Valley, Minnesota.
General Mills has a habit of skirting the truth with its marketing and advertising, according to CSPI. In 2009, the Food and Drug Administration took enforcement action against the company for making misleading cholesterol-lowering and cancer-prevention claims on Cheerios packages. Before resorting to litigation, CSPI had privately urged General Mills to change its ‘fruit’ snacks labels, but without success.
Source: CSPI
© FoodBev Media Ltd 2024