The latest news, trends, analysis, interviews and podcasts from the global food and beverage industry
The European Union is poised to push back the implementation of its much-anticipated anti-deforestation regulation (EUDR) yet again.
Originally scheduled to take effect on December 30 2025, the European Commission announced a 12-month extension for the implementation of the regulation back in October last year (2024).
The EUDR has been a focal point of environmental policy since its inception. First proposed in 2021, the EUDR aims to curb the import of commodities linked to deforestation.
The regulation was designed to ensure that products sold in the EU do not contribute to the destruction of forests, aligning with the bloc's broader commitment to sustainability and climate action.
However, the implementation timeline has faced multiple setbacks, with initial deadlines postponed from 2024 to December 2025.
Now, the EU is considering yet another delay, raising significant concerns for the food and beverage sector that heavily relies on these commodities.

A troubling pattern of delay?
The EUDR aims to ensure that imports of commodities such as palm oil, cocoa and coffee do not originate from deforested land. This regulation is a critical step in the bloc’s commitment to sustainable sourcing and environmental protection.
However, this latest postponement raises significant concerns for businesses in the F&B sector (and beyond), which rely heavily on the products at the heart of deforestation issues.
The European Commission has cited complications with the IT platform designed to manage compliance data as the reason for the delays. This has raised serious questions about the EU’s preparedness to enforce such crucial regulations effectively.
European Commissioner for Environment, Jessika Roswall, expressed concerns regarding the functioning of the IT platform, stating that it could create “uncertainty for authorities and operational difficulties for stakeholders.”
She added: “In view of this, the Commission is considering a postponement of the entry into application of the EUDR, currently foreseen for 30 December 2025, for one year”.
The World Wildlife Fund (WWF) has criticised the European Commission's repeated delays, describing them as leading to “massive stranded costs” for companies that have already invested in compliance.
Anke Schulmeister-Oldenhove, forest policy manager at the WWF European Policy Office, condemned this latest development, stating: “It is probably no coincidence that this move comes right as the Commission pursues an unprecedented deregulation agenda, throwing the EUDR under the bus. This is unacceptable and a massive embarrassment for President Von der Leyen and her Commission.”
Schulmeister-Oldenhove further asserted: “We should be able to expect more from our leaders than an excuse like ‘The dog ate my homework’! We’re calling on the Commission to step up its efforts and investments to get this system up and running by the end of the year instead of proposing a further delay of this important law and caving in to political pressure.”
In a statement on its website, WWF also highlighted the urgent consequences of these delays: "Since the EUDR was postponed last year, over 23 million trees have been lost forever. Over 7 million trees were lost due to chocolate consumption alone, and another 7 million trees due to beef and leather."
"Additionally, 4.41 million more trees are destroyed every year for soy, which is fed to animals and ends up on our plates in foods like fish, cheese or eggs."

Industry reactions and concerns
Christine Schneider, a leading negotiator on the EUDR, welcomed the opportunity for further discussion but cautioned that the persistent delays signal deeper issues within the regulatory framework.
“The renewed postponement clearly shows: the problems run deeper and cannot be solved by further transitional periods or non-binding guidelines,” she said in a press release.
Schneider's call for the introduction of a ‘zero-risk’ category – potentially exempting certain countries from compliance – adds another layer of complexity to an already fraught negotiation process.
The timing of this announcement is particularly striking, coinciding with the EU’s recent trade negotiations with Indonesia, the world’s largest palm oil exporter.
While the Commission has assured that Jakarta will still need to comply with EUDR obligations under the new trade deal, the delay raises concerns about the EU's commitment to enforcing sustainable practices in its trade relationships.
Nicole Rycroft, founder and CEO of Canopy, expressed a critical perspective on the delay: “The EU’s decision to once again delay the implementation of the EUDR creates uncertainty when clarity and momentum are needed. Forests – and the climate – cannot afford another year of inaction.”
Rycroft also highlighted the need for companies to leverage this delay as a “springboard” to build resilient supply chains and transition towards low-impact alternatives.

Navigating uncertainty in F&B
For the food and beverage sector, this regulatory standoff represents both a challenge and an opportunity. Companies must navigate the uncertain regulatory landscape while simultaneously responding to growing consumer and investor demands for sustainable practices.
The delay could be seen as a chance to innovate and strengthen supply chains, but it also risks eroding market confidence and slowing progress towards sustainability goals.
As the EU grapples with its regulatory commitments, businesses must remain vigilant and proactive. Stakeholders must advocate for stronger regulations and work collaboratively to ensure that the EUDR, once implemented, effectively addresses the urgent challenges of deforestation and climate change.
While this latest delay may provide temporary relief for some, it underscores the pressing need for decisive action in the face of mounting environmental challenges.
The food and beverage sector cannot afford to wait for regulations to dictate their practices; instead, it must lead the charge towards sustainable solutions that benefit both business and the planet.