top of page

The latest news, trends, analysis, interviews and podcasts from the global food and beverage industry

FoodBev Media Logo
Access more as a FoodBev subscriber

Sign up to FoodBev and unlock more insights from the international food and beverage industry. Subscribers have access to webinars, newsletters, publications and more...

Nov - Food Bev - Website Banner - TIJ vs TTO 300x250.gif
Siân Yates

Siân Yates

12 November 2024

RaboResearch: Nutri-Score controversy grows as brands withdraw and retailers persist

RaboResearch: Nutri-Score controversy grows as brands withdraw and retailers persist

The Nutri-Score labelling scheme, designed to simplify nutritional information for consumers, is facing mounting challenges as several brands withdraw from participation, while retailers continue to embrace the initiative. This tension highlights a critical debate within the European food and beverage sector regarding the efficacy and fairness of front-of-pack nutrition labels.


A recent report from RaboResearch underscores the controversy surrounding the Nutri-Score, which has been criticised for oversimplifying the nutritional quality of products.


Case study: Danone


The report highlights Danone – once a strong proponent of the scheme – which recently announced plans to gradually remove the Nutri-Score label from its dairy and plant-based drinks. This decision follows an update to the Nutri-Score algorithm that reclassified these products into the beverage category, resulting in lower average scores.


Industry experts suggest that Danone's partial exit raises questions about the integrity of the labelling system, as companies are expected to apply the scheme uniformly across all product categories.


The implications of Danone’s withdrawal are significant. According to the principles of the Nutri-Score, brands are not permitted to selectively display scores that favour their products. This move may set a precedent for other companies considering similar actions, potentially undermining the credibility of the labelling system as a whole.


Divided opinions


Resistance to Nutri-Score is also evident among certain EU member states, particularly Italy and Portugal, where concerns about national identity and traditional foods have led to pushback against the scheme. Italian officials argue that Nutri-Score unfairly penalises popular products such as cheese and cured meats, which often contain higher levels of saturated fats and salt.


In a striking move, Italy has proposed a constitutional amendment that would complicate the implementation of Nutri-Score within its borders. Similarly, Portugal recently reversed its decision to adopt the label, citing insufficient consultation with national food authorities and concerns over the potential misrepresentation of traditional Portuguese foods.


Amidst this backdrop of resistance, retailers across Europe are moving forward with the Nutri-Score initiative. Major supermarket chains, including Carrefour, Auchan, Delhaize, Aldi and Lidl, are expanding their adoption of the scheme, viewing it as a commitment to promoting healthier food options. Lidl Spain, for example, has pledged to implement Nutri-Score labelling on all its private label products by 2026, significantly increasing its current coverage of 50%.


However, not all retailers are on board. Switzerland’s Migros announced in May that it would not adopt the Nutri-Score system, citing low benefits and high costs associated with its implementation. This divergence among retailers reflects a broader uncertainty within the industry about the long-term viability and effectiveness of the Nutri-Score system.


Algorithm overhaul


Tracking the impact of the recent algorithm update reveals notable changes in the distribution of Nutri-Score ratings across various food categories. Private labels, which have a higher adoption rate of the scheme, serve as a useful benchmark.


The average scores for many products have dropped significantly since the algorithm's revision in January 2024, often without any changes to the actual formulations. The two-year transition period for the new algorithm may result in further declines in average scores as products adjust to the updated criteria.


In the bakery, meat, fish and plant-based food categories, similar trends are observed, suggesting that the Nutri-Score’s influence is reshaping the landscape of food labelling across Europe. As brands grapple with the implications of these changes, the future of Nutri-Score remains uncertain, caught between the demands of consumer transparency and the complexities of nutritional science.


#research #NutriScore #labelling #Europe

bottom of page